Our devices work for Big Tech, not us - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
卧底经济学家

Our devices work for Big Tech, not us

Hate for a $100 to-do list is misplaced
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.03,"text":"Given how many things there are to rage-tweet about these days, it was almost a pleasure to stumble upon the hate for the Analog to-do list system, available from a Philadelphia-based design studio, UgMonk, for a mere $100. What does that $100 buy you? Basically, some nicely formatted index cards, and a luxurious wooden box (walnut or maple) to keep them in. You can even get a subscription to get more cards sent to you every quarter! What’s not to despise?"}],[{"start":39.63,"text":"I have no plans to abandon my trusty notebook. Still, I think the haters are sadly mistaken, as haters often are. This rather pretentious piece of design gestures towards three truths about productivity systems that we’d do well to embrace."}],[{"start":56.370000000000005,"text":"The first is that the multifunctionality of our digital devices is often a curse. Tools that do less often give us more."}],[{"start":66.06,"text":"Our electronic devices don’t work for us; they work for Big Tech. Anyone using apps for basic organisation must run a gauntlet of distractions before they can answer the simplest questions about what needs doing. "}],[{"start":79.85,"text":"Gloria Mark, author of Attention Span, is known for her increasingly alarming studies of our proclivity to be distracted. Using software to log people’s computer habits, Professor Mark has found that we now average 47 seconds on one screen or window before clicking away to the next thing. You don’t need to believe the precise number to recognise the problem."}],[{"start":105.58,"text":"Some of these distractions (TikTok, Instagram reels, YouTube shorts) don’t even pretend to be useful, but checking email or Slack can feel productive, responsive and professional while actually diverting you from the serious projects you hoped to accomplish. What were those serious projects again? You can’t remind yourself without running that gauntlet. "}],[{"start":129.66,"text":"In such an environment, trying to make real progress on what matters to you is like trying to lose weight by signing up for a gym located between an ice-cream parlour and a hamburger joint. It’s not impossible, but you are demanding of yourself an act of focus and willpower every time you try to do the right thing."}],[{"start":150.95,"text":"Such acts of focus and willpower are possible, but you can do yourself a favour by avoiding the worst offenders entirely — nobody needs TikTok in their lives — and relegating others to the desktop rather than the phone, and by installing blocking software on your browser to remove the temptation to check email or YouTube for the next hour or so. All this can help make your technology work more in your interests and less in the interests of the tech titans. "}],[{"start":180.54999999999998,"text":"Still, it is telling that such measures are tempting. We have computing power at our fingertips that previous generations could barely have imagined, and yet what often passes for productivity advice these days starts with trying to kneecap the computer before it kneecaps us. Should we really be surprised that a paper-based productivity system seems attractive?"}],[{"start":206.1,"text":"The second truth is that the art of productivity is mostly quite simple. Keep track of what’s on your mind by writing it down. When you’re deciding on what to do next, pick from a short list, not an exhaustive (and exhausting) one. Use a calendar so you don’t miss appointments. Be decisive. Don’t let small tasks linger. Do them, delegate them or discard them. If a large task is hanging around, stop to clarify what it really involves. Be realistic and be kind to yourself about what anyone can really achieve in a day."}],[{"start":243.79,"text":"Is that it? No, but that’s about 80 per cent of it, and it’s all perfectly achievable with a paper calendar and a notebook or, sure, fine, a stack of index cards. The other 20 per cent of useful personal productivity skills are more complicated and more controversial, and, in most cases, technology won’t help much with the complicated stuff either. "}],[{"start":null,"text":"


"}],[{"start":270.53999999999996,"text":"That, then, is the case for a simple paper-based productivity system. It’s not a compelling case — digital calendars have some useful features and so do project-management tools such as Trello. But while it would be a radical act to insist on using a typewriter instead of a word processor, or to spend days at a time without internet access, there is absolutely nothing odd or self-denying about relying on pen and paper as an organisational tool. "}],[{"start":301.83,"text":"The final question, then. Does it have to cost $100? Of course not. A stack of 3in x 5in cards will do the same job. But one could say the same thing about a Rolex or a Birkin bag: alternatives are available that will do almost the same job for a fraction of the price. We all get to have our own priorities. "}],[{"start":324.96999999999997,"text":"For what it’s worth, there is a defence to be made for buying high-end productivity tools. David Allen, in his personal-productivity bible Getting Things Done, argues that a good productivity system isn’t reliant on fancy equipment, but adds that the fancy equipment can be a big motivator. Allen is a fan of label-printing machines and nice pens. “I have done some great thinking and planning at times, just because I wanted to use my great-feeling, smooth-writing fountain or gel pen!” he enthuses. You may chuckle (I do) but if he’s brainstorming his next big idea while you’re playing Clash of Clans on your iPhone, perhaps the joke is on you."}],[{"start":369.34999999999997,"text":"Cal Newport, author of Deep Work and Digital Minimalism, emphasises the importance of ritual in helping us to focus. If you’re trying to get into German philosophy, for example, take the book to the pub and order a German beer to sip while you read it. (He calls this the “Heidegger with Hefeweizen” tactic.) Looking for what’s fun and memorable about the real world helps us push back against the endless samey stimulation of the digital. "}],[{"start":400.88,"text":"I don’t think I need any more walnut or maple in my life, and I don’t need a subscription to get fancy notecards. I suspect I’ll be sticking to my unglamorous combination of notebook, Trello boards and Google calendar for now. But this morning I experimented with pulling out an index card, writing a list on it, and propping it against my monitor."}],[{"start":424.42,"text":"A second card of a different colour represents the “next” list. It includes a bunch of other tasks that I might have been tempted to face immediately, but which are tucked away out of sight and out of mind until the first list is finished. This is a delightfully simple way to focus on just a few urgent or important tasks, secure in the knowledge that the backup list is in easy reach. A multicoloured pack of index cards costs £2.99 for 100 cards, and even without the walnut box, they seem to be working just fine."}],[{"start":459.55,"text":"Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend Magazine on X and FT Weekend on Instagram"}],[{"start":476.98,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1762511885_5394.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

万斯力挺特朗普经济政策,试图扭转舆论风向

美国副总统呼吁民众在生活成本负担能力问题上保持耐心,他还把美国顽固的通胀归咎于前总统拜登。

风向逆转:生活成本负担能力问题让特朗普陷入困境

美国总统将生活成本负担能力问题斥为“骗局”,遭遇民众的强烈反弹。

低增长已成为欧洲最大的金融稳定风险

欧洲最大的金融稳定风险已不再是银行,而是低增长本身。只有实现更强劲的增长,欧洲才能保持安全、繁荣与战略自主。

好莱坞导演罗伯•莱纳夫妇遇害,儿子尼克被捕

洛杉矶警方正在调查《摇滚万万岁》导演罗伯•莱纳遇害一案。莱纳生前除影坛成就外,也因长期投身民权事业而备受政界与娱乐圈人士称赞。
1天前

“稳定币超级周期”为什么可能重塑银行业?

一些技术专家认为,未来五年内,稳定币支付系统的数量将激增至十万种以上。

一周展望:英国央行会在圣诞节前降息吗?

与此同时,投资者一致认为,欧洲央行本周将把基准利率维持在2%。而推迟发布的美国就业数据将揭示美国劳动力市场处于何种状态。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×