Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

“不过就是一枚炸弹”

两个陌生人和一次勇气非凡的壮举的真实故事。

坐飞机时穿得体面是有道理的

有许多人去机场时都会穿上剪裁合体的长裤、纽扣衬衫、外套和系带皮鞋——而这样做的理由,是我之前没想到的。

AI给我们带来了什么,又夺走了什么?

随着我们接近2025年的尾声,许多人正试图盘点哪些国家引领了AI竞赛、哪些公司从AI中赚得最多。但归根结底,这些对普通人意味着什么?

欧盟计划严打“极其危险”的中国包裹

欧盟司法委员表示,需要采取行动保护消费者免受在希音等平台上销售的产品的侵害。

伦敦的私密会员社交场景正在壮大——只是别叫它们“俱乐部”

尽管有报道称富裕人群正从英国出走,一类新型机构仍在纷纷开门迎客。

杰米•李•柯蒂斯:我的天赋是对生命的热爱

在步入花甲后“解放天性”、又抱回奥斯卡小金人,这位演员的事业一路飙升——她正尽情享受这股热潮。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×