Private equity turns to new fundraising tactics in tough market - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
财富管理

Private equity turns to new fundraising tactics in tough market

Firms are hoping to attract investors to single deal offerings with cheaper fees

Private equity firms are increasingly raising money to buy individual companies on a deal-by-deal basis, as they struggle with a downturn in the market and investors look for ways to cut management fees.

A record $31bn was deployed by “deal-by-deal” investors last year, according to data provided by private equity advisory firm Triago, defying a broader dealmaking and fundraising slump in the industry.

This was more than five times the amount raised and invested in 2019. More than 700 companies were acquired by private equity in this type of deal last year, more than double the total from five years ago.

Among those offering or considering these types of deals are some of finance’s biggest names, including hedge fund Elliott, US investment giant Hamilton Lane, as well as others such as European credit firm Hayfin, said people familiar with the details.

“Barely a conversation goes by with investors who aren’t looking at, or are open to, doing deal-by-deal type investments,” said William Clegg, a partner at private equity advisory firm Colmar Capital. “It’s everyone from insurance companies, [to] sophisticated family offices and even sovereign wealth funds.”

Traditionally, private equity firms raise money from investors in a structure that locks in cash for more than a decade. This is used to buy a portfolio of companies. The firms charge management fees of between 1.5 and 2 per cent and take 20 per cent of the profits when portfolio investments are sold on. The structure means private equity executives can make good money on fees even if they have not invested their clients’ money.

However, after a decade-long industry boom, private equity groups have been struggling to sell portfolio investments and to convince investors to lock funds up for long periods with high fees attached. Including venture capital, the industry raised $803bn last year, the lowest amount since 2017.

Dealmakers have also found it hard to find attractive new deals in a higher interest rate environment, leaving them sitting on $4tn of ‘dry powder’, or uninvested client funds.

The deal-by-deal approach can be an easier sell to investors. It often means lower, more bespoke management fees, though dealmakers can demand a bigger proportion of profits when the investment is sold on. But investors also know where their money is being spent from the start of the process.

“Deal-by-deal transactions are favoured by institutional investors because they have the opportunity to cherry pick their preferred companies,” said Sunaina Sinha Haldea, head of private capital at Raymond James. “These deals typically come with lower fees than traditional fund investing.”

Investor money can also be put to work and returned more quickly than from a traditional pooled fund, which is particularly relevant in a slower market where firms are earning fees on mountains of uninvested cash.

“A lot of general partners are sitting on dry powder,” said Matt Swain, chief executive of Triago, which specialises in raising money for these types of transactions. “The [deal-by-deal] management team won’t sit on their money which is important in this environment.”

Investment banks are looking to get in on the action. In December, California-based Houlihan Lokey announced a deal to buy Triago.

The difficult fundraising market has also increased the attractiveness of deal-by-deal investing to executives who want to set up on their own.

“The primary fundraising market has been challenging for everyone including named brands, and it’s almost been closed for first-time funds,” said Andy Lund, co-head of Houlihan Lokey’s private funds group. “There has been much more activity on the deal-by-deal front.”

For dealmakers who have struck out on their own, deal-by-deal investing can help them build a record and relationships with potential investors to tap if they want to raise a fund in the future.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国经济为何能与其他经济体拉开差距?

美国的优异表现源于其令发达国家羡慕的长期生产率增长。特朗普的政策会危及其领先地位吗?

叙利亚叛军攻势增强了土耳其在叙的影响力

长期支持反对派组织的安卡拉看到了击退库尔德武装分子并迫使阿萨德谈判的机会。

德国裁员潮导致大选气氛低落

这个欧洲最大经济体正面临数十年来最严峻的经济形势,而2月份的大选正是在此背景下进行的。

Lex专栏:“无人驾驶”的Stellantis无法找到成功之路

首席执行官塔瓦雷斯的离职并没有使这家汽车制造商更接近复苏。

COP29主办国见证里海创纪录退缩

阿塞拜疆生态官员表示,随着气候变化的影响,世界上最大的内陆水体将在“在数周内”达到最低水位。

欧洲工商管理学院首次在FT欧洲商学院排名中登顶

巴黎高等商学院和伦敦商学院分别列于第二和第三位。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×