For young people, the job search has never been so miserable | 对年轻人来说,求职从未如此痛苦 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

For young people, the job search has never been so miserable
对年轻人来说,求职从未如此痛苦

Automated application processes are dehumanising and unhelpful
00:00

undefined

The writer is the author of ‘Uncharted: How to Navigate the Future’

I’m currently employing a young man, a recent graduate with a degree in cyber security. But he’s not keeping my network safe from hackers. He’s splitting logs, because the hours he is spending alone online, searching for his first job, are leaving him isolated and depressed. His mother was almost in tears worrying about him. My view was that one small help might be some work that gets him out of the house and gives him a bit of fresh air, exercise and cash. 

It’s a poor solution to a desperate problem. He is one of tens of thousands of young people, often derided by older generations as snowflakes or slackers. But he is none of these things. He turns up on time and does excellent work. If I were still running software companies, I’d give him a try. At least an interview. Except that that isn’t how the job market works these days. Instead, the world’s bedrooms are full of lonely young people wading through websites that promise their efficient algorithmic filtering will take them straight to the dream job. In fact they do no such thing. 

Just try it. On some of the most popular job hunt websites, I submitted search terms including the words “entry level” or “junior”, and received pages and pages of jobs, most requiring at least three, even five, years of experience. It’s a terrible business model that values high traffic and time spent on site over accuracy. But of course, the applicants aren’t the customers — advertisers are. Who cares if kids who just want their first real job burn themselves out wading through pages and pages of irrelevant ads that essentially convey a simple message: you are worthless? 

If by some fluke, job searchers unearth a relevant lead, they devote countless hours to crafting a tailor-made personal statement. These applications are rarely acknowledged, and it’s unclear if anybody reads them. Instead they are scanned and mostly rejected, usually without even an automated “thanks but no thanks”. A 2021 Harvard Business School study showed that 90 per cent of employers use automated tracking software to sift through applications, even though most acknowledge that these systems vet out qualified candidates because they don’t precisely match the criteria in the job description. The rarities that get through to the next of an unknown number of rounds, often then face tests or interviews with a bot that provides no feedback.

Job seekers learn nothing from this process, only that the world doesn’t care about them. After months of searching, they feel humiliated and utterly alienated from the world of work, before they’ve even started. It is the most dehumanising process I have ever encountered. And I once worked in a call centre.

While ministers debate reducing benefits to boost incentives, they might consider how profoundly disincentivising the system for acquiring jobs is. It is a recipe for disaffection and rage. When young people see that society takes no stake in them, it’s a small step for them to reject any stake in society. A few candidates will know people who know people, but many parents don’t know how to help their children, so profoundly has the world of work changed since their first jobs. Watching this automated misery, they feel humiliated too.

Employers may imagine the system is efficient. In fact, it is a wasted opportunity. Every time someone applies for a job, there is a chance to build that company’s reputation. Those young people (and their parents) are also consumers. So this is a moment to polish a brand, not tarnish it. Kids will remember who helped and who treated them as disposable. No amount of advertising will persuade them that the companies that never replied will ever care, about people or the planet or customers.

The whole dismal system sends a weak signal for an already uncertain future. Earlier this year, research from Imperial College London found that in the two years between July 2021 and July 2023, “online freelancers in professions that are more vulnerable to automation saw an overall 21 per cent fall in weekly demand for their skills”. Lacking clout or a union, these workers are largely invisible.

Those who unthinkingly embrace technology in recruitment are wilfully blind to its consequences. Across the board we have generations of eager, able young people struggling to pay the bills and make their contribution. We should be thinking now about how to preserve social cohesion, if only for the simple reason that, without it, no business will flourish.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:亚洲将遭遇“特朗普交易”的冲击

汽车行业保护主义抬头的定价过程才刚刚开始。

马斯克对特朗普的押注得到了回报

特斯拉和X的首席执行官将成为特朗普总统身边最具影响力的政治和商业顾问之一。

巴尼耶削减养老金的计划触动了法国人的神经

法国总理的这一省钱提案遭到反对,尽管人们呼吁加强代际公平。

英国学费上涨对学生和大学财务状况的影响

专家称,这些措施不足以解决高等教育经费问题或吸引来自贫困家庭的学生。

这次美国大选对美国企业意味着什么?

大选结果将对能源、汽车和制药等领域的企业产生重大影响。

德国的商业模式失败了吗?

德国三大主要产业同时陷入低迷,经济也停滞不前。政客们终于清醒过来了吗?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×